3/6/2023 0 Comments Tim locastroHowever, the run contribution of his HBP% and his BB% results in 25.478 runs. That would result in, on average, 24.84 runs for Locastro. To think about that in a bigger picture, I want you to imagine that Locastro never got hit by a pitch, but instead his BB% was increased to the sum of his HBP% and BB% with his 250 PA. In 2019, specifically, hit by pitches led by 29 points (.690 to. Revisiting the wOBA constants, a hit by pitch has a higher run contribution than an unintentional walk. Locastro getting hit by pitches more than walking may be a good strategy as well, albeit to a small extent. This should, in theory, give Locastro a better ability to maintain his HBP%, as he controls the main factor. What can be concluded from this is that his HBP% didn’t come due to a high frequency, but rather Locastro’s ability to crowd the plate. While above average, it’s not as mind-boggling as his league-leading 8.8 HBP% with a 250 PA minimum. With a minimum of 750 pitches, the results put Locastro’s pitch percentage at 19.6, ranking him 89th and putting him in the 64th percentile. These are the parts of the plate that are out of the zone and are inside for righties, given that gameday zones are from the catcher’s perspective. To quantify this, I took the percentage of pitches that right-handed hitters saw in gameday zones 11 and 13. Locastro does this because he’s a master at crowding the plate. While walking at that rate is based on more of a skill, Locastro has found a way to contribute more of a run impact with poor plate discipline. Add that to his BB%, and the result ranks higher than the likes of Angels third baseman Anthony Rendon, Astros outfielder George Springer, and Reds first baseman Joey Votto. With a minimum of 250 PA, Locastro’s HBP% led the league at 8.8. Locastro is the master at getting hit by pitches. Well, as some of you may know, the answer is right here. They gradually increase as the bases do, as one would expect.ĭigressing back into OBP, the question may now be: how is his OBP so high in general? It’s a very fair question, as only 15 of his 250 PA were extra base hits, his BB% was a poor 5.6, and K% a closer-to-average 17.6. 690, while home runs sit the highest, at 1.940. If you visited the wOBA page, you may have noticed that it uses constants to measure the run contribution each outcome. 323, respectively and, the more bases the hit, the more runs it will, on average, lead to. The answer is quite simple: difference in run contributions.Ĭontreras and Alonso are known for their abilities to hit the ball well. We have a winner! But, you might be asking: how is his wOBA so low when his OBP is so high? After all, Contreras had a. 357, a mark that puts him two points above Cubs slugger Willson Contreras and one point below Mets slugger Pete Alonso. Well, maybe his on-base ability is good? As aforementioned, his OBP sits at. Like his contact, his slugging ability is very poor. His Brls/PA% is also extremely poor, at 0.8%. 292, as aforementioned, and his xSLG% at an abysmal. To begin, his ISO and SLG% fare very poorly, at. So then, how good’s Locastro’s slugging ability? Well, to sugarcoat it, it’s not something that’ll stick with you. As this information implies, his contact is quite poor. Locastro’s stdLA ranked 10th worst out of every player with a 100 batted ball event minimum (31.7). The lower the number (or “tighter” the launch angle), the better the tool. Alex Chamberlain, who dissected the stat tremendously, concluded that it could explain a batter’s hit tool. To get a lot more advanced, we can look at his standard deviation of launch angle. His batting average is slightly below league average, with a difference of six points. Locastro’s contact tool really isn’t impressive. 314 wOBA is puzzling, especially when you consider that the non-pitcher league average is. That’s not to say that Locastro is a good hitter, he’s quite a poor one. Most baseball fans will correctly tell you that it’s impossible to be a good hitter without good contact, on-base talent, or slugging ability. However, the real art of Locastro’s story isn’t how good he’s been, it’s how he’s been able to be that good. His expected stats weren’t strengths either, with a. He isn’t a great player by any definition of the word last season, he posted a. Well, Tim Locastro’s success story isn’t as glamorous or significant as those examples. Baseball fans alike fondly reminisce upon some of the best ones: Jackie Robinson and Branch Rickey breaking the color barrier, Billy Beane’s use of unconventional stats, and players overcoming adversity to have great success at the big stage. Someone who beats the system, odds, and criticisms of their peers. Everyone loves to hear a good success story.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |